Deepfake technology, a sophisticated application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), represents one of the most striking examples of how emerging technologies can both innovate and disrupt the digital ecosystem. Derived from the term “deep learning,” deepfakes employ Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), a dual-network system where a generator produces synthetic content and a discriminator evaluates its authenticity, to create highly realistic but entirely fabricated visual or auditory media. This iterative training process enables the generation of synthetic images, videos, and audio clips that convincingly replicate real individuals while subtly altering their expressions, speech, or actions. Initially developed for research and entertainment, deepfake technology has rapidly evolved, aided by increased computational power, the availability of large digital datasets, and accessible open-source software.
While the technology holds legitimate potential in sectors such as film production, accessibility, education, and virtual communication, its misuse has become a growing global concern. The emergence of manipulated political videos in India, such as the 2020 circulation of AI-generated deepfakes of Bharatiya Janata Party leader Manoj Tiwari and Madhya Pradesh Congress chief Kamal Nath, highlighted how this tool can be exploited to distort public discourse and spread misinformation. Beyond politics, deepfakes have been used to create non-consensual pornography, commit identity theft, perpetrate financial fraud, and erode trust in media authenticity. The ease with which such content can now be produced and disseminated poses serious threats to privacy, consent, reputation, and even democratic stability.
From a legal standpoint, deepfakes challenge the adequacy of existing privacy and data protection regimes. Most current laws, including India’s Information Technology Act, 2000 and traditional provisions on defamation or cybercrime, were conceived before the advent of AI-driven synthetic media. As a result, they lack the precision and scope to address the nuanced harms arising from digital impersonation and synthetic identity manipulation. The absence of explicit legal definitions, coupled with jurisdictional complexities in online dissemination, complicates enforcement and accountability.
One of the most immediate legal and ethical concerns surrounding deepfake technology is its potential to invade personal privacy. By leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, deepfakes can replicate an individual’s likeness, voice, or mannerisms without consent, often for malicious purposes. The most distressing manifestation of this misuse is non-consensual deepfake pornography, where a person’s face is superimposed onto sexually explicit material. Such acts cause severe emotional trauma, reputational damage, and psychological harm, disproportionately affecting women.
Many jurisdictions recognise a “right of publicity” that prevents the unauthorized commercial use of a person’s image; however, these laws often fail to address non-commercial deepfakes used for harassment, misinformation, or defamation. In India, while Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000 penalizes the capturing or transmission of private images without consent, it does not extend to AI-generated manipulations of publicly available images. The Supreme Court’s ruling in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) affirmed privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21, encompassing bodily autonomy, informational privacy, and human dignity. Deepfakes directly violate all three dimensions by weaponizing personal data to distort identity and exploit individuals without consent.
The creation of deepfakes frequently involves scraping publicly available data from social media platforms, online archives, and biometric systems. This practice raises grave concerns regarding data privacy, particularly when facial scans and voice prints, forms of sensitive biometric data, are used without authorization. With India’s digital ecosystem expanding rapidly, the misuse of such data poses a serious threat to both individual privacy and national cybersecurity.
Although global frameworks like the >EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) offer strong data protection standards, their enforcement against anonymous or cross-border deepfake creators remains challenging. In India, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 ( DPDP Act) has now been enacted, providing a legal framework for consent-based data processing and user rights. However, enforcement challenges persist, especially regarding AI-generated deepfakes and synthetic identities.
Beyond personal misuse, deepfakes also present a structural risk to privacy by enabling sophisticated forms of surveillance and mass manipulation. Governments and private entities could exploit synthetic media to fabricate evidence, manipulate elections, or create deceptive surveillance footage. Such practices blur the boundary between legitimate state security interests and the individual’s right to privacy. Incidents like the alleged use of Pegasus spyware in India have already raised public concerns about surveillance; deepfakes could amplify these fears by making fabricated content indistinguishable from reality.
The broader societal impact lies in the erosion of trust in digital communication. When the authenticity of images, videos, or audio recordings becomes uncertain, the foundations of privacy, reputation, and informed consent are destabilized. This erosion not only affects individuals but also undermines democratic institutions, journalistic integrity, and public confidence in the rule of law.
Deepfake technology fundamentally disrupts the traditional understanding of consent. Ordinarily, the use of an individual’s image, voice, or likeness in public or commercial contexts requires explicit consent. However, deepfakes often simulate a person’s likeness without their knowledge, let alone approval. This non-consensual replication, particularly when used for defamation, misinformation, or pornographic purposes, constitutes a direct violation of personal autonomy and dignity. The challenge becomes more complex when the origin of the manipulated content is unclear or when the creators operate anonymously, making accountability difficult. In the digital realm, where artificial intelligence can fabricate convincing content detached from any real act or intent, the very notion of meaningful consent is being redefined.
Traditional legal frameworks governing consent, such as copyright permissions, image rights, and privacy waivers, are ill-equipped to address the implications of AI-generated synthetic media. These laws presuppose human authorship and conscious participation, conditions that deepfake creation often lacks. Moreover, the question of informed consent becomes ambiguous when an individual’s likeness is used in a context or for a purpose they could not have anticipated. For instance, consenting to the posting of one’s image on social media does not equate to consenting to its manipulation into synthetic pornography or political propaganda. The digital environment has therefore exposed the inadequacy of existing consent mechanisms in safeguarding individuals against AI-driven identity distortions.
Some legal remedies have been adapted to tackle the issue of non-consensual deepfakes. Tort law, through the false light doctrine, offers limited recourse for individuals misrepresented in fabricated content. Similarly, “revenge porn” statutes in several jurisdictions criminalize the non-consensual distribution of sexually explicit material and have been extended to cover deepfake pornography. In India, offences under Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 penalize the publication or transmission of obscene or private material, though these provisions were not designed with AI-generated content in mind.
Despite these partial protections, there remains a pressing need for targeted legislation that explicitly addresses consent violations in the context of deepfake technology. Such a framework should establish clear definitions, impose obligations on content platforms to detect and remove synthetic media, and ensure that individuals retain meaningful control over their digital likeness in an increasingly artificial media landscape.
Recent years have witnessed growing global consensus on the need for stronger governance of AI-generated media. The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), expected to take full effect by 2025, introduces obligations for transparency, risk classification, and watermarking of synthetic content. Similarly, major technology companies like OpenAI, Meta, and Google have implemented AI watermarking and content authentication tools to help identify and label artificially generated media. These measures aim to counter misinformation, enhance accountability, and restore public trust in digital communication. Together, such developments indicate an international shift toward proactive regulation and ethical AI deployment, reinforcing the importance of privacy and consent in synthetic realities.
The emergence of deepfakes, digital twins, and virtual identities has fundamentally redefined the meaning of privacy and consent in the digital age. As technology increasingly blurs the boundaries between reality and simulation, traditional legal frameworks struggle to protect individuals from the misuse of their likeness, voice, or data. Deepfakes, in particular, expose critical gaps in existing consent laws, highlighting the need for nuanced, technology-specific legislation that can address manipulation, identity theft, and reputational harm.
To safeguard individual autonomy, it is essential to move beyond reactive legal responses and adopt proactive regulatory measures, combining digital literacy, ethical AI development, and robust consent mechanisms. The future of privacy in synthetic realities will depend on how effectively society can balance innovation with accountability, ensuring that human dignity remains central even in a world increasingly shaped by artificial realities.
We at Data Secure (Data Privacy Automation Solution) DATA SECURE - Data Privacy Automation Solution can help you to understand EU GDPR and its ramificationsand design a solution to meet compliance and the regulatoryframework of EU GDPR and avoid potentially costly fines.
We can design and implement RoPA, DPIA and PIA assessments for meeting compliance and mitigating risks as per the requirement of legal and regulatory frameworks on privacy regulations across the globe especially conforming to GDPR, UK DPA 2018, CCPA, India Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023. For more details, kindly visit DPO India – Your outsourced DPO Partner in 2025 (dpo-india.com).
For any demo/presentation of solutions on Data Privacy and Privacy Management as per EU GDPR, CCPA, CPRA or India DPDP Act 2023 and Secure Email transmission, kindly write to us at info@datasecure.ind.in or dpo@dpo-india.com.
For downloading the various Global Privacy Laws kindly visit the Resources page of DPO India - Your Outsourced DPO Partner in 2025
We serve as a comprehensive resource on the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 & Draft DPDP Rules 2025), India's landmark legislation on digital personal data protection. It provides access to the full text of the Act, the Draft DPDP Rules 2025, and detailed breakdowns of each chapter, covering topics such as data fiduciary obligations, rights of data principals, and the establishment of the Data Protection Board of India. For more details, kindly visit DPDP Act 2023 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 & Draft DPDP Rules 2025
We provide in-depth solutions and content on AI Risk Assessment and compliance, privacy regulations, and emerging industry trends. Our goal is to establish a credible platform that keeps businesses and professionals informed while also paving the way for future services in AI and privacy assessments. To Know More, Kindly Visit – AI Nexus Your Trusted Partner in AI Risk Assessment and Privacy Compliance|AI-Nexus
.png)
Regus Elegance, Level 2, Elegance Tower, Mathura Road, Jasola, New Delhi – 110025, INDIA
Copyright 2025, AI-Nexus All Rights Reserved.